This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. 5. Pay Criminal Fines. Counsel now asserts this was in error. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. Toggle navigation. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Proc. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. 2 If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. (Code Civ. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. 22 I. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. 20 Tentative Rulings. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. http://www.scscourt.org You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. We're sorry your court map could not be found. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. . Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Tentative Rulings. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. before the hearing. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 8 Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. The hearing is taken off-calendar. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Any party who wishes to 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. fechar. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. WebFelonies/Veterans Court.
WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Changes to Family Court Operations
What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 663. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. Probate Tentative Rulings. Skip to main content. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 5 If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). will be able to access it on trellis. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). Department 11. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 1255.410 et seq. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. In this section. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! 10 Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. You can always see your envelopes ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. View court access restrictions and other updates. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 18CV327382]. SAETERN, ET AL. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to Court's
SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. This is a lemon law case. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Department 10. Williamstown NJ 08094. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: 3 INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL.
Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, Please wait a moment while we load this page. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). will be able to access it on trellis. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. California Rule Court. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings.
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings